Why CyberOptik / Quality Standards
Words like quality, best practices, and attention to detail are easy to put in a proposal and hard to hold anyone to. We'd rather show you what quality means in practice.
Before a CyberOptik website goes live, it passes a 75-point quality assurance check. This page explains the categories that check covers so you can evaluate our standard before you choose us, not discover it after launch.
Why we check before we launch
They're the ordinary things that get missed when a site is rushed out the door: a form that doesn't deliver, a link that goes nowhere, a page that looks broken on a phone, a redirect that was never set up. Individually small, collectively the difference between a launch that builds trust and one that quietly loses it.
The 75-point quality assurance check is our defense against that. It's a structured review completed at the Launch step of the Optik Method, applied to every managed website before it goes live.
What the 75-point check covers
We describe the categories here rather than publishing a numbered line-by-line list, because the exact items get refined over time and applied according to each project's scope. What stays constant is that every launch is reviewed against each of these areas.
We confirm that forms submit correctly, validation and any conditional logic behave as intended, and notifications and confirmations reach the right place. A website that can't capture a lead isn't finished, no matter how it looks.
We check internal and outbound links, confirm that important old URLs are redirected to the right destinations, and verify that the launch protects the search value the previous website earned. This is where careless redesigns lose rankings, and where careful ones don't.
We review page titles, meta descriptions, and indexing settings so search engines and social platforms see the website the way they should on day one.
We review the website across major browsers and at desktop, tablet, and mobile sizes to confirm the layout holds together and the design behaves as intended rather than only looking right in the environment it was built in.
We verify that the site is structured for efficient loading and that image optimization and performance measures are in place. No agency can promise an identical score on every page, device, and connection, but the preventable problems have been addressed.
We review the content that made it into the build for obvious errors, placeholder text, and missing pieces so the website reads as finished rather than half-populated.
We confirm that analytics and any agreed tracking are in place so you can measure the website from launch instead of realizing weeks later that nothing was recorded.
Every project has requirements that are unique to it, from a particular integration to a specific feature or content type. The check verifies that the requirements defined in your scope are actually present and working.
What our standards do not claim
Stating these limits is part of the standard. A promise you can't keep isn't a quality standard, it's a liability.
How this connects
The quality check is one step in a larger process. It works because the steps before it (strategy, design, development, and refinement) were done deliberately. And it matters after launch because a website that launches clean still needs ongoing care to stay that way.
See how the 75-point check fits the full 8-step CyberOptik process. Explore the Optik Method ->
See how we keep a launched site healthy over time. Website care and support ->
Common questions
We describe the categories publicly and apply the specific checks internally, adapted to each project's scope. The categories on this page are the honest summary of what every launch is reviewed against.
The categories are consistent for every managed website. Which specific items apply depends on the project's scope, since not every website has the same features, integrations, or content types.
No. The check prevents the common, avoidable problems that cause most bad launches. Ongoing care handles the issues that emerge over time as software and content change.
We consider accessible design and development practices during the project. Formal accessibility testing against a specific standard, remediation, and ongoing monitoring are scoped explicitly when a project requires them, rather than implied by the standard check.
Ask us how the 75-point quality assurance check would apply to your project. We're glad to walk through what we verify and why before you commit.